Is I Love You in Spanish Te Amo or Te Quiero

If you want to tell someone you love him or her in Spanish, do you say te amo or te quiero? Any decent dictionary will tell you that either amar or querer (and even some other verbs such as desear, gustar and encantar) can be translated in some contexts as to love. Theres no simple answer to the question, as it depends on context as well as where in the Spanish-speaking world you are. In an appropriate context, neither te quiero nor te amo is likely to be misunderstand as a way of expressing love. But there can be some differences—some subtle, some not. What Are the Differences Between Amar and Querer? Beginning Spanish students are tempted to think that because querer is a verb that often means to want—you can go to a restaurant and tell the waiter that you want a coffee by saying quiero un cafà ©Ã¢â‚¬â€that it isnt a good word for using to express romantic love. But thats simply not true: The meanings of words vary with context, and in a romantic setting Te amo simply does not refer to wanting in the same way that a person would want a cup of coffee. Yes, querer is a verb that can be used in casual contexts, but when said in a loving relationship it can be quite powerful. Although usage can vary with locality, the fact is that querer can be used in all kinds of loving relationships (as can amar), including friendship and marriage and everything in between. And even though one its most common meanings is to want, when said in the context of a relationship it doesnt have to have the sexual overtones that something such as I want you can have. In other words, context is everything. Heres the problem with Te amo: The verb amar is a perfectly good verb for to love, but (again depending on the locality) it isnt used as much as querer in real life by most native speakers. It might come across as something someone might say in the subtitles of a Hollywood film but not something two young lovers would say in real life. It might be something your grandmother might say, or something that sounds, well, stuffy, or old-fashioned. Even so, it is frequently used in poetry and song lyrics, so it may not sound as off as the preceding may suggest. Probably the best way to be certain about which verb is best where you are is to eavesdrop on the conversations of those you to emulate. But obviously that would seldom be practical. In general, though, it can be said that the safer choice—say youre a native English speaker falling in love with an hispanohablante—is to use Te quiero. It will be understood, it will sound natural, and it will sound sincere anywhere. Of course, under these circumstances, Te amo isnt going to be misunderstood, and nobody will fault you for using it. Alternative Ways of Saying ‘I Love You’ Just as I love you in English is both the simplest and most common way of expressing affection, so are Te amo and Te quiero in Spanish. But there are other ways as well if you want to go beyond the simple. Here area four of them: Eres mi carià ±o: Carià ±o is a common term of affection; common translations include love and sweetheart, and it can also be used to refer to affection in general. It is always masculine (even when referring to a female) and conveys a feeling of warmth. Eres mi media naranja: It may sound strange call your sweetheart a half orange, which is the literal meaning of this sentence, but think of how the two pieces of a split orange might fit together. This is an informal and friendly way of calling someone your soulmate. Eres mi alma gemelo (to a male), eres mi alma gemela (to a female): This is a more formal way of calling someone your soulmate. The literal meaning is You are my soul twin. Te adoro: Translated literally as I adore you, this is a lesser used alternative to the big two. Key Takeaways Te quiero and te amo are both very common ways of saying I love you, and in a romantic situation neither is likely to be misunderstood.Querer (the verb from which quiero is derived) can mean to want, but in romantic contexts it will be understood more like love.Both querer and amar can be used for to love in nonromantic contexts, such as the love of a parent for a child.

French Words Starting With A, B and C

Essay on Creationism vs. Evolution How did it really...

Creationism vs. Evolution: How did it really happen? Ever since 1859 and the publication of On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin1, his first publication of his observations, much debate has come about concerning the issue of how life on earth came to be. Both the Creationists and Evolutionists believe in the Big Bang theory of creation of life; however, the mechanism for the development of new life provides the conflict. Evolutionists believe the cause of life on earth to be accidental, random atomic collisions (non-living matter), known as abiogenesis2. Creationists believe the cause to be supernatural intervention outside the physical world, God. Both groups have reasons for what they believe. However, proving either theory†¦show more content†¦However, the theory of evolution is based on the concept of macroevolution, numerous microevolutionary changes over a long period of time resulting in new life forms.6 diagram illustrating adaptive radiation Major discrepancies come in the theory of evolution because there is no testable proof of macroevolution. Many scientists over time have come to accept Darwin’s observations as facts. Books written on evolution use Darwin’s ideas as proof of evolution. This is incorrect, because no new evidence to prove evolution has come about since Darwin.7 Thus, his ideas can’t be used to prove a theory, because this theory is based on observation rather than fact. Also, the word evolution itself is used interchangeably with different meanings. Darwin used it to mean development, when the true meaning is, an opening, or new beginning. Evolutionist theories are fickle, in that each time a flaw arises, a new theory is developed to cover it up. Dr. David W. Cash feels evolution is nothing but lies covering lies.8 Mark Isaac points out major misconceptions about evolution: 1. [True]Evolution hasShow MoreRelatedHow The Earth Created And How Did We Get Here?2018 Words   |  9 PagesYou Believe How was the Earth created and how did we get here? This question has been in the heads of everyone that has had 5th grade education. The two main theories that try and explain how the earth, the universe, and humans were created are Creationism and Evolution. No one really knows which theory is right, I mean people believe that the theory that they believe in is right, but neither one of the theories have be proven right scientifically. The wonder on how the world was createdRead MoreI Have Always Been A Science Centered Girl3245 Words   |  13 PagesI have always been a science-centered girl. Science and math, no matter how hard, always kept my attention and interest. The science of evolution has always aroused my mind, as the part of biology that sparks my interest most is genetics and the findings of Darwin. All throughout learning the basics up to my AP biology class, I believed evolution to be a fact. This is because it was taught as factual, and I saw no evidence against it. My teachers always seemed well informed and because they wereRead MoreEvolution And Religion : The Disconnection2016 Words   |  9 PagesEvolution and Religion: The Disconnection For years, theologians and scientists have debacled as to which theories could be categorized as correct as opposed to incorrect theologies. On a larger scale, these individuals debate the question of the universe’s origin, as well as the origin of life itself. Some of the most contemplated questions theologians face are those that include thoughts regarding the creation of all living things. Whether or not all things that currently inhabit the world areRead MoreWill Science And Religion Ever Reconcile?1920 Words   |  8 Pagesaccepted scientific principle to which the church objected. At their formation the church disagreed with the idea that the earth was flat, the scientific explanations for disease and illness and of course evolution is a topic still widely debated and often framed as the ultimate argument of science vs. religion. Although the Catholic Church still has over 1.2 billion members, today its power is far removed from what it was in Galileo’s days. Science too has progressed and advanced in vast steps andRead MoreGod Through The Eyes Of Science2793 Words   |  12 Pages God through the Eyes of Science The sound of silence spread through the hospital. Those who stood by, saw new-born Joseph lying in the doctor’s arms, his young body taking in fresh air weeping. How could this be? The doctors were seriously concerned for Joseph’s wellbeing and did not expect a hysterically crying baby with a strong chance of not making the next hour, if he were to even survive the pregnancy. Fortunately, miracles like this one continue to suggest a supernatural being that can breakRead More Biblical Creationism versus Scientific Origin Essay example8399 Words   |  34 PagesBut it most certainly does not require one. I think it would be prudent to define a few terms first. Evolution: The change in life over long time scales by descent with modification through natural selection, except when used in astronomical context (where it refers to slow changes in stars and galaxies.) Creationism: Specifically, I use this to mean Christian young-earth creationism; the belief that Earth was created in 6 literal days as written in Genesis 1. Taxon: a division of life: kingdomRead More2B study guide Essay7886 Words   |  32 Pagesunderstand generally where such a number comes from... while we would not require you to replicate the calculation, you should know the general approaches that are used to estimate global diversity] 10. Contrast autotrophs and heterotrophs in terms of how they acquire energy and nutrients. -Autotrophs: Produce their own forms of energy through inorganic materials -Heterotrophs: Obtain energy and nutrients from their diet 11. Which of the following is the best answer to why plants on land are green Read MoreModule Quizzes Essay14245 Words   |  57 PagesModule 1: Syllabus How long do you have to take an E-test? 2 hours Which of the following is curved? E-tests and the E-final Final Grades have? Pluses and minuses If a positive feedback signals reaches the comparator, what occurs? Comparator will turn on the controlled Where should you go to find updates on the course? Announcements in Bioespresso Where should you go to access your readings and assignments? www.bioespresso.com Where do you submit your extra credit paper? DrRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pagesrelevancy should attract readers. Stanley Baronett. Jr., University of Nevada Las Vegas Far too many authors of contemporary texts in informal logic – keeping an eye on the sorts of arguments found in books on formal logic – forget, or underplay, how much of our daily reasoning is concerned not with arguments leading to truth-valued conclusions but with making choices, assessing reasons, seeking advice, etc. Dowden gets the balance and the emphasis right. Norman Swartz, Simon Fraser University

Stakeholder and Issues Management †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Stakeholder and Issues Management. Answer: Introduction The business model of Domino is based on growing sales through franchisees, not to make the profit but to take a royalty from each and every sale. The stores of Dominos are bought and sold on the basis of the sales, not as per the calculation of profit. The company believes that the network of the company will have more stores and that will result in more profits for the company. The company focuses on products and services. Dominos in Australia has witnessed major issues despite the success story. The employees of the franchisees are facing huge stress and they are demotivated. There are concerns with the structural and behavioural patterns of the organisation. The pressure from the higher management affects the performance the morale of the employees. The autocratic leadership style of the franchise owner, Del Santo creates unrest among the employees. The assignment studies the low morale of the employees and the stress the employees face due to the lack of good communication patt ern in the organisation. Dominos is a global brand that is famous for pizza and the company has a network of franchises and retail stores all across the globe. Domino has a credible presence in Australia and has been enlisted on the ASE, the Australian Stock Exchange in the year 2005. The company has more than six hundred retail stores in the country. The company has earned a total revenue worth of $939,976,000 in the year 2016. The company is famous for its drones, fast pizzas, franchisees, and for the good workers. The company has developed technology to keep abreast of all the sales and operations of the franchises. The updated statistics are conveyed through IT technologies so that the head office can find the average size of the order for the employees and the duration that takes the pizza to reach the customers. The store earning determines the bonus for the managers of the stores and that is given to them in every quarter. Dominos in Australia has witnessed major issues despite the success story. The employees of the franchisees are facing huge stress and they are demotivated. There are concerns with the structural and behavioural patterns of the organisation(Weiss, 2009). The pressure from the higher management affects the performance the morale of the employees. The autocratic leadership approach of the senior management affects the culture of the workplace and the pressure of the management remains a hindrance for the quality performance of the staff members. The poor communication of the senior management with the frontline manager of the franchisees bring huge gap in the operations of the organisation. Identification of issues and problems The autocratic leadership style has been found in Del Santo. The underpayment wages and underpayment of penalties are found in the stores. Del Santo reduced the cost of the labour below 27% of sales. This has affected to the payroll system of the store and the work hours of the staff are lowered. The employees got less payment. He manipulated payroll and blamed his employees for the differences. He was treated by the employees as the dictator of the organisation. The autocratic leadership style of Del Santo has a negative impact on the performance of the organisation. The style of Del Santo is based on Taylors scientific management theory. The theory focuses on the control of the decision-making process domination. This kind of management is found in an organisation with a hierarchy that is very rigid(Daft, 2010). Del Santo advocates that his leadership style has a positive impact as it directs people to work sincerely, improve work method cooperation among the employees will be established. The negative impact of the autocratic leadership style is evident. The leadership style that Del Santo follows is based on Taylors theory and it ensures effective efficient accomplishment of work. But it does not have the impact on the employees practically. It has created resentment among the employees of the organisation(analytitech.com, 2016). The low morale of the workers lack of inspiration the employees lost their interest to work. Manipulation of the shift hours of the employees, violation of the payroll conditions practices, no payment for overtime and no payment for even the appropriate working hour etc. are major issues and it affected the operations of the franchisees(Ferrel, Ferrell, Fradrich, 2008). Most of the workers are afraid of losing their jobs for the policy of payment based on the working hours of the employees. The resentment among the workers remains the major issue for Dominos franchisees to manage the image of the brand of the company. The resentment will lead the lack of motivation and this will affect the company in the long run. The possible solutions are made in order to combat the immediate issues that are faced by the organisation. The followings are the possible solutions attempted in the assignment. Needs of changing the hierarchical structure of the franchisees The hierarchical structure has a negative impact on the management of the franchisees. The top level managements remain influential and the leaders become autocratic and formulate the rules as per their requirements(George, 2017). The change in the hierarchical pattern of the organisation will allow the employees to report their concern directly to the top level management so that the rules and regulations will be prepared well(valuebasedmanagement.net, 2017). The decision making will be delayed. The immediate boss cannot take immediate decisions as the decision making power will not be given to him or her. The change in the leadership style of leader will bring a change in the culture of the management will of the organisation. The workers will have no low morale and they will be very innovative in the workplace. They will not quit their jobs and will not get afraid of losing their jobs. The work method requires to be standardised and the work accomplishment should be done with the cooperation of the workers(Hawkin Mothersbaugh, 2012). A dictator leader makes everybody work as per the standardised laws. Thus a leader cannot always be a transformational leader and the autocratic leadership style will contribute to the growth of the organisation. Communication and motivation for the employees The communication between the top level management and the managers at the operational level is very important. The appropriate communication will bring no gaps in the operations. The employees will be well aware of the expectations and they will act accordingly. This will also help the management to motivate people to work more(Kannair, 2007). The interpersonal relationship will be developed and the top level management of Dominos can easily get the information from the bottom level employees. The workers do not require all information. More information will create confusion in them. This affects their efficiencies the productivity of the organisation will be decreased. Appropriate communication pattern Dominos success at the franchisee level is possible when the communication between the franchisee and the head office remains transparent and unbiased. The wage fraud practices at the franchisees are due to the unlawful behaviour of the franchisees. The communication at an appropriate level will help the entire organisation to communicate the policies of the organisation to all the employees( Parker Evans, 2014). The communication from the managerial level at the franchisees to the top management of the head office will be made on the everyday basis so that the head office will remain alert on the functioning of the stores or the franchisees. The rights of communication to the employees will help for the immediate communication and no fraud will be made at the lower level. The employees will not feel afraid and they can report the wrong practices at the lower level( Woiceshyn, 2011). The communication between CEO, managers and the frontline staff employees of Dominos will bring effective results on the development of the morals of the employees and the culture of the organisation will be effective. The feedback from the employees will accurate and the management can easily get the information related to the needs of employees and the stores and franchisees. Dominos can find out the issues at the franchisees and at the stores. The top management can solve their problems. Recommendation The leader can be taken the opinion of the employees before taking the decisions. The employees can help the Del to devise strategies to meet the expectations of the head office and to perform well at the franchise level. The communication process will be effective and the strategies will be formulated successfully. Review of the performance of the employees, managers and the management of Dominos is very important. The review will offer the exact feedback. The feedback will high light how the different stakeholders are performing and what steps are required to manage the issues. Del requires taking the feedback of the employees and the managers before making unlawful plan to reduce the working hours and reducing the payment of the workers. Bibliography Grima, T. (2012, 08 04). Positioning and Perceptual Mapping. Retrieved 08 25, 2017, from https://tonygrima.wordpress.com/tag/perceptual-map/ Parker, C., Evans, A. (2014). Inside Lawyers' Ethics - Page 347 - Google Books Result. Retrieved 08 25, 2017, from Christine Parker, Adrian Evans: https://books.google.co.in/books?isbn=110764173X Woiceshyn, J. (2011). A model for ethical decision making in business; Reasoning, interaction and rational moral principles,. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 311-323. analytitech.com. (2016). Theory of Motivation. Retrieved 08 25, 2017, from analytitech.com: https://www.analytictech.com/mb021/motivation.htm bhpbilliton.com. (2017). Operating with integrity. Retrieved 02 27, 2017, from https://www.bhpbilliton.com/our-approach/operating-with-integrity Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization Theory and Design (10 ed.). South-Western CENGAGE Learning. Ferrel, O. C., Ferrell, L., Fradrich, J. (2008). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases (8 ed.). South-Western CENGAGE Learning. George, N. (2017, 08 10). Five Components of an Organization's External Environment. Retrieved 08 25, 2017, from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/five-components-organizations-external-environment-17634.html Hawkin, D. L., Mothersbaugh, D. L. (2012). Consumer Behaviour. Building Marketing Strategy( 11th Edition). McGraw-Hill. Kannair, J. (2007). The Ethical Mind. Harvard Business Review, 85(3), 51-56. mantragroup.com.au. (2017). To be the favourite by Knowing What Matters. Retrieved 08 25, 2017, from https://www.mantragroup.com.au/About-Us/Vision-Values-Strategy.aspx valuebasedmanagement.net. (2017). Analysing Organisational Culture: Summary of three level by Schein Abstract. Retrieved 08 25, 2017, from https://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_schein_three_levels_culture.html Weiss, J. W. (2009). Business Ethics: A Stakeholder Issues Management Approach. South Western CENGAGE Learning.

A Conclusion On Overall The Project Essays

A Conclusion On Overall The Project Essays A Conclusion On Overall The Project Paper A Conclusion On Overall The Project Paper Conclusion On overall, the project has achieved its objectives. The project has provided a client/server application for food ordering system and was successfully built using Visual Basic 6. 0 software. It provides a more convenient and accurate method for staff in the restaurant since orders are transferred to server in the kitchen immediately and displayed to the chefs for further process. In view of time saving, less time consuming by waiting and transferring order by staff in restaurant. In other words, this can minimize the waiting time spent at the restaurant. Apart from using internet application, It can be extended using Bluetooth technology. Thus make the application more simplistic and robust. B. Recommendations There are some improvement can be performed to the system in the future: I. The client can be designed In a Pocket PC or PDA using suitable software. I. Develop a proper database that can link directly to both client and server Interface. Ill. Include a proper Graphical User Interface that Is easy to use by both users for client and server. Lb. Add more function button to provide variety function of system v. Add more feature window such as table display, food display, online booking and others to attract customers. A Conclusion On Overall The Project By Contemplating Apart from using internet application, it can be extended I. The client can be designed in a Pocket PC or PDA it. Develop a proper database that can link directly to both client and server interface. Iii. Include a proper Graphical User Interface that is easy to use by both users for v. Add more function button to provide variety

Keep Going - An Interview With Two #1 Amazon Bestsellers

Keep Going - An Interview With Two #1 Amazon Bestsellers "Keep Going" - An Interview with #1 Amazon Bestsellers Mark Edwards and Louise Voss Success doesn’t happen overnight. It is often the result of hard work put in over the years. And Mark Edwards and Louise Voss’ success story tells us as much. They are known for being the first indie authors to ever reach #1 on Amazon.co.uk back in 2011. Now with Amazon Publishing, their latest book is From The Cradle (and the best one, they tell me). Their story begins much sooner, though. They have been through the ups and downs that characterize a writer’s life, but they have been through them together and always determined to keep going.Today, we have the pleasure of interviewing both of them. They share their whole story (not only the success part) and their advice for starting indie authors. They also debunk a metadata-myth, analyze why Amazon Publishing is so powerful and explain how to co-write a book using Dropbox.So sit down with a nice cup of tea/coffee, and hit play. Or alternatively, read through the whole transcript below (courtesy of the Reedsy team). REEDSY: Hi Mark and Louise, I’m really pleased to have you here. You are known for being the first indie authors to have reached the top of the charts on Amazon.co.uk, a few years ago, with two books that you had co-written. But your collaboration started long before that, right Louise?LOUISE: Sure, it’s a good story, though it can make me sound a bit like a stalker. It started years ago, around 1998-99, and Mark was on this TV documentary about â€Å"wannabe writers†. I was in the exact same situation as him: I had an agent but she wasn’t very enthusiastic. We were both getting lots of rejections but they were really positive rejections. So I just sent him a little email via his agent, basically saying â€Å"I really liked your interview†.He wrote back, and we started corresponding via email about books and writing for around 18 months before we finally met in person. And then we thought: rather than just critiquing each other’s stuff, why d on’t we write something together? That’s when we started writing Killing Cupid. We did it all by email, because at that time Mark was in Japan.MARK: Yes, I was in Tokyo, and Louise was in London. We wrote an entire novel without even speaking to each other, literally. This was back in 2001, and Killing Cupid was optioned by the BBC but we didn’t manage to get a publishing deal for it.Then, a few years after, I came back from Japan and we decided to write another one together: Catch Your Death. Back then, however, we didn’t have an agent, we still couldn’t get a publisher, we were really back to square one, so we pretty much gave up at that point, didn’t we?LOUISE: Yes, I think the problem with Killing Cupid was a genre one. When we sent it to publishers, they said â€Å"well, it’s not really enough of a thriller to be a thriller; and it’s a comedy as well, we don’t know what to do with it†¦Ã¢â‚¬  And that’s why we decided to write Catch Your Death, because that was unquestionably a thriller.MARK: Yes, so we both more or less gave up. I came back to the UK, got a good job, and thought: it’s really not worth the pain of trying to find a publishing deal.Then, 2010 when was I first heard about KDP. And I got a Kindle for my 40th birthday. So I said to Louise: why don’t we take our two old novels, spruce them up a bit, self-publish them and see what happens? And she was very reluctant.LOUISE: Yes, I thought â€Å"oh, no, it will be humiliating, we’ll sell 4 copies†¦Ã¢â‚¬ MARK: So we spent a few months rewriting and reworking them, because they were really out of date. There were no mobile phones, social media, etc.We put Killing Cupid out in February 2011, and as Louise predicted we sold around 4 copies on our first day, to people that we knew†¦ But then I became completely obsessed about trying to sell it. I had a full-time job, my girlfriend was pregnant, and she still talks about how I neglected her during that time! And Louise did promotion stuff too.LOUISE: Yes, we had a list of all the bloggers that accepted unpublished books - there weren’t that many of them but we put together this list and divided it up. Mark started at A and I started at Z and we worked our way to the middle, contacting all of them. It was a lot of work.REEDSY: And Mark, you did a very good job on the metadata too, right? I read about it on Joanna Penn’s blog, but maybe you can tell us what in your metadata helped make your book successful?MARK: Yes, we used subtitles. On Killing Cupid, I think it was pretty simple: â€Å"Killing Cupid, a psychological thriller†: nothing fancy, really. But we kept rewriting the blurb (book description). Back then, you used to be able to see what percentage of people who viewed your book had bought it, which was fantastic, you could see your conversion rate from browser to reader. So I kept looking at th e books in the top 10, especially the self-published thrillers and the ones that had the highest conversion rates, and tried to figure out what it was about those books that incited more people to buy them after they looked at them.So I was continually tweaking the description and I think that at one point I got it right, because it suddenly doubled our sales in just an hour. I had made the description shorter, more straightforward about the book while also making it sound more intriguing.We did something much more interesting for the second book, Catch Your Death. We called it: â€Å"Catch Your Death (For fans of Dan Brown Stieg Larsson)†. This quickly became a controversial point, with people starting to talk about it in The Bookseller magazine.But I actually believe, to this day, that it didn’t make any difference to the sales, because I think we put off as many people as we attracted. If you searched for Dan Brown at the time (and I did it quite a few times), our book didn’t come up, not even on page 30. It didn’t make any difference to the search results.What really made a difference, and this is a lesson for all indie authors, is that we were patient and hardworking in building a readership. We hand-sold every copy of Killing Cupid in the first 3-4 months: every single sale was hard work. And as we did that, we built a momentum and started climbing up the charts, which made our book more visible. And because it was good, word-of-mouth really worked in our advantage and more people started to buy it.We released Catch Your Death around 3-4 months after Killing Cupid, as Killing Cupid was climbing into the top 100. And Amazon then sent out an email advertising Catch Your Death to all the people who had previously purchased Killing Cupid.And it was the day that this email went out - even though we only realized this quite a long time afterwards - that more and more readers started buying both books and we shot up into the top 1 0. A couple of days later, Amazon removed the Dan Brown subtitle, and it didn’t make any difference at all.So there was a lot of hype about our metadata at that time, but I really don’t think it made any difference in the end. It was all about slowly building that readership.REEDSY: I think that’s a great lesson indeed for indie authors. But if we go back to the writing process, Louise, how does that technically work? What tools do you use: Google Drive, Dropbox, †¦?LOUISE: Dropbox, we have everything in Dropbox. It works really well for us, you can see the last things people have worked on and when. Though sometimes it happened that we were both working on the same document at the same time, so when we saved it created conflicted copies, which are a nightmare to sort out. But we don’t do that so much now, we’ve got better at it.We also email a lot, and text, when it’s particularly urgent, but we don’t actually talk that much, un less there is a problem, or in the beginning and the end, when there are things to figure out.MARK: For Dropbox, we have a â€Å"master document† - we do it all in Word - and we write separate chapters in separate Word documents, save them into Dropbox for the other person to make comments. The original author then goes back to that chapter to amend it and when we’re both happy with it we add it to the master document!We also have other Word documents and spreadsheets for our chapter plans. I think that, ideally, we’d use Scrivener, because that’s what we both write on for our solo novels, but you can’t really use it for collaborative work, as far as I’ve been able to work out.REEDSY: Now, with the success of Killing Cupid and Catch Your Death, you were prompted to partner with an agent, who got you into traditional publishing. How was that experience?LOUISE: It’s quite ironic, because we spent years trying to get a publishing deal for both books. But we didn’t have an agent at all until we were #1 on Amazon. I was talking with an author friend of mine and he suggested me to contact his agent. I said â€Å"well, he turned us down a few years ago so I don’t think he’ll be interested†. He answered â€Å"oh, it’s different now, you’re #1†. So we contacted his agent and he quickly got us a deal with HarperCollins, which was fantastic! I don’t regret it, really, because it was just so lovely to finally have this public validation through a traditional publishing deal, and the idea to have our books in shops, the advance, etc.I often wonder, with the benefit of hindsight, whether we would do it differently if we had to do it again, and I don’t think we would change much, other than to get more involved in the marketing and publicity of these traditionally published books. We were thinking that the publisher would do most of the marketing and promotion, a nd it didn’t happen. So I think our mistake wasn’t taking the deal, it was not pushing the books as much as we had when we were self-publishing.MARK: Louise literally just took the words out of my mouth. I definitely don’t regret it either, it was â€Å"a dream come true†. Louise had already had a traditional publishing deal in the past, but for me it was something I’d wanted for years.LOUISE: Yes, I guess I was a bit more cynical about it, because I already had had an experience with a publisher who dropped me after not promoting the books - and that was back in the day when you could do little yourself. But I still don’t regret it, we had a lovely editor, who did an excellent editorial work, really improving the books. It’s just that not many people got to see them.MARK: Yes, that was the frustrating thing. What happened is that after the first and second books didn’t do as well as they hoped, the third and fourth ones were pretty much dead in the water.LOUISE: It basically took the exact same trajectory as my first publishing deal: sales got smaller and smaller and the publisher’s interest got smaller and smaller. Also, one thing to take into account is that two of the four books had already been self-published before and picked up by a lot of people. So I think that didn’t help us as much as we thought it would.MARK: That was the problem, really. Catch Your Death and Killing Cupid came out a year after we first self-published them, which means the sequel to Catch Your Death came a year and a half after the first book, and by then, everyone had lost interest. And it wasn’t pushed at all, it wasn’t in any shops, it had no visibility.I actually think that we were a little bit like guinea pigs, because we were the first â€Å"indies† to go through that process over here in the UK. The publishers learned from what happened with us for some of the following indie success stories that they picked up.REEDSY: So you were with a publisher that didn’t do as much as you hoped on the marketing side of things. But now you’re with Amazon, right? Which is almost the opposite.MARK: Yes, but there is a stage in between. In January 2013, we were in a dark place. We’d had a very disappointing 2012 with the two paperbacks, and when the third one came out in January it just disappeared without a trace. Literally without trace, it left nothing.I had gambled by quitting my job to be a full-time writer, and I was in a very difficult financial position, with massive tax and credit card bills, plus my wife and I had another baby on the way. So I really was in a state of constant panic, thinking â€Å"what am I going to do?† I can laugh about it now, but it was terrible at that time. Every now and again I think â€Å"I can’t believe I managed to get myself out of that dark pit that I was in†.I remember Louise and I had this meeti ng with our agent in London and he - now, he would probably deny it - but he had lost a bit of interest in us as well. But we were determined to make it work so we decided we would not give up, and start a new series of books instead.Now, I had this book â€Å"The Magpies† that I had had sitting in my bottom drawer for years, and I’d been tinkering with it, on and off. Louise said: â€Å"why don’t you just do it, just self-publish it?† So I went home that day, read through it, and thought â€Å"actually, this is quite good†. So I self-published The Magpies via my agent (it’s called â€Å"agent-assisted self-publishing†) and it basically completely transformed everything, because The Magpies ended up selling (in its self-published version) 170,000 copies. It simply changed my life, and it’s what led to the deal with Amazon.Amazon Publishing bought the rights for it and for another solo novel from me. And when Louise and I fini shed our new co-written one, it did go out in submission to various publishers, but Amazon pre-empted it and our commissioning editor there read it in a few days. They made an offer, and because I’d had such a great experience with them already, Louise thought: â€Å"why not?†Everything so far with Amazon Publishing has been fantastic. I mean, I’d like to sell more books in the US, but in the UK it couldn’t have gone any better I think.REEDSY: Yes, and we actually interviewed another Amazon-published author, Bob Mayer, a few weeks ago who highlighted the â€Å"marketing reach† of Amazon publishing imprints. What does that mean exactly? What do these imprints do in terms of marketing that makes it worth it signing away royalties to them?MARK: Well, they’ve got the most amazing database in the world. They’ve got anyone who has ever bought anything, including anyone who has ever read a psychological thriller! That’s what sets them apart from all the other publishers. Plus, they’ve got the platform of their website, and they also do a lot of on-device marketing. So if you’ve got a Kindle Fire, you’ll see that whenever you turn it on, an advert will appear on the home screen, and they rotate, but they’re often books.That visibility that you get with Amazon publishing is just fantastic. The restriction of being with them is that you’re pretty much only on the Amazon platform, although they do print books and they are making efforts to get them into the shops. But they’re not on any of the other digital stores, so you’re in kind of a walled garden, like a luxury gated development!When somebody from a big publisher said to us: â€Å"well, wouldn’t you rather be with a traditional publisher and have your books in the shops?†, my answer was that that all sounds great, but when we did have that opportunity, our books were barely in the shops anyway†¦REEDSY: So, do you now still produce some marketing effort yourselves or is it all Amazon?LOUISE: We’ve worked very hard on building up our Facebook page. It’s not like we have tens of thousands of followers, but the ones we do have are so loyal that it’s really helping us get the word of mouth thing going, which is the holy grail of marketing anyway. But we still do work very hard, especially when we do online launches.REEDSY: To finish on an encouraging note for other authors out there: you’ve been through everything, both of you, in a writer’s career; the ups, the downs, so what would be your advice for an author who’d be in a â€Å"dark year† like you had in 2012?MARK: I think it’s certainly nurturing your existing fans and readers. That is what goes through in our Facebook group, where we have really loyal readers as Louise pointed out. They were really really helpful and acting as cheerleaders to keep us going. And then when we did start selling well, they were there and helped spread the word.REEDSY: And Louise, what would be your advice?LOUISE: Keep going!We lost the rest of Louise’s advice due to recording problems, but feel free to ask her (or Mark) anything in the comments below!Sharing is caring, so here are our Twitter handles: @ReedsyHQ, @mredwards and @LouiseVoss1

SUMMARY WORKSHOP-RESEARCH METHOD CLASS Coursework

SUMMARY WORKSHOP-RESEARCH METHOD CLASS - Coursework Example Bryman defines quantitative data analysis as the process through which a researcher transforms all the data observed or collected into numerical data. The method of analysis often answers questions, describes events, or a situation that the â€Å"how† and â€Å"what† questions apply. The method deals with measuring or attributes that are related to quantities (Bryman 2008). Quantitative data analysis is applied to find evidence used to prove wrong or support a hypothesis or idea. The research method operates using three types of quantitative measures including nominal, ordinal, and interval. These measures provide certain advantages that are associated with their use during the analysis of data. Quantitative analysis utilizes statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) to ensure accuracy of the results derived from the analysis. The data tool resembles a spreadsheet, but it has a different modus operandi. The statistical tool is preferred for analyzing data generated from social sciences research studies because it is tailor made for this task. Bryman looks at a comparison of quantitative and qualitative data analysis methods with the view of their potential when they are integrated. The two levels of research approach research from different scopes of discourse and analysis. Though there are disagreements over the possibility of combining the two methods, a number of research approaches have employed a structure that closely resembles the quantitative/qualitative research approach (Bryman 2008). The two types of research are fundamentally different and they have been described as explained; while quantitative analysis is considered rationalistic and positive qualitative analysis is considered naturalistic and constructivist. Because of these fundamental differences, the two analysis techniques are applicable in different stages of a research study (Sarantakos 2005). In conclusion, quantitative and qualitative